Personal Genetics Education Project

Debating direct-to-consumer genetics and medical ‘paternalism’

How much background is needed to make sense of genetic analysis? How to people react to such information? Do we need to think differently when talking about direct-to-consumer analysis versus the type of information one is likely to receive in the medical arena from a certified genetic counselor?  These questions come up whenever pgEd is talking with students, and even in our more informal conversations with friends, colleagues and neighbors.  Recently, several writers have tackled some of these questions, with sometimes divergent conclusions. We appreciate the nuanced arguments both Virginia Hughes and Laura Hercher make in their articles.  We think these pieces also could find a place in the classroom, maybe to augment our lesson about “direct-to-consumer genetic testing.”  We could also see teachers finding these pieces great as background reading ahead of teaching almost any of the pgEd lessons.

Virginia Hughes in Slate: It’s Time to Stop Obsessing About the Dangers of Genetic Testing 

Laura Hercher (via David Dobbs’ Wired blog): The Case for Paternalism in Genetic Testing

Upcoming Events

Tue 16

CRISPRcon steering committee meeting

October 16
Des Moines IA
United States
Tue 16

American Society of Human Genetics 2018 annual meeting

October 16 - October 20
San Diego CA
United States
Mon 22

Maine Council for the Social Studies annual conference

October 22, 8:00 am - 3:00 pm
Augusta ME
United States

In the News

Load more

Sign Up For Our Newsletter